Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Zalensky would have been given plenty of opportunity to stay...

First 215144 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
albatrosss

19,936 Posts.

636

23/04/24

22:22

Post #: 73485599
Share

Originally posted by moorookamick: ↑

Obviously you have not been involved in high level negations
where compromises are required on both sides in order to
reach an agreement?

The strategy is that both sides always ask for more than they
will eventually settle for with "red lines" on both sides; the rest being
negotiable.

The tragic thing about this war is that both sides have lost so much
that it will make a negotiated settlement all the more difficult because
both sides will eventually have justify to their respective citizens
that their respective catastrophic loss of lives was worth the outcome..

IMO the proper time to have negotiated was prior to Feb 2022 and IMO
had both sides foreseen the current stalemate/war of attrition, they would have
been more inclined to compromise .

Expand

Zalensky would have been given plenty of opportunity to stay neutral at least and not push for NATO membership.
But he chose to throw his population under the bus.
.
He should be made to answer and give reasons why he chose to sacrifice the population and country of Ukraine.
8 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 2,328 more messages in this thread...

First 215144 Last