Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"...they were still attacking and aiming for more - I think that...

First 216105 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dirtygecko

4,560 Posts.

18

28/04/24

17:03

Post #: 73545175
Share

Originally posted by tangs: ↑

ebbs and flows
at one styage russia held 27% of Ukraine not the 18% they have now
.....and at that time russia weren't shutting up shop and building defensive lines .....they were still attacking and aiming for more - I think that illustrates russias aims quite well - they did want Odesa and did want Kyiv at very least .
Ukraine have taken back A LOT of their land since that time when russia reched it's peak control of Ukraine

the loss of territory recently ....and it will continue for maybe another months or so .....was inevitable in the context of the shortages and russ air superiority combined
these problems are being addressed now and russias window of opportunity for easy gains will close soon
but russia never took even 1% of Ukraine during that "easy time" for them over months and what they did take came at a very heavy cost in men , vehicles and in artillery

Expand

"...they were still attacking and aiming for more - I think that illustrates russias aims quite well ..."
Unsubstantiated statement. Faulty logic.

"...but russia never took even 1% of Ukraine during that "easy time" for them over months and what they did take came at a very heavy cost in men , vehicles and in artillery..."
There is no objective to conquer all of Ukraine militarily, so your statement is false. All the nonsense about percentages and snail paces is irrelevant.

The objective of the Ukrainian government is to restore it's 1991 borders, which is what they've been trying to do for the past 10 years now. How is that working out for Ukraine?

Please muster your "calculous" skills, and let us all know, when will Ukraine restore it's 1991 borders.
1 Upvote

Reply