Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"...I've already PROVED to you it WAS constitutional based on...

First 216350 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dirtygecko

4,560 Posts.

18

28/04/24

22:58

Post #: 73547968
Share

Originally posted by tangs: ↑

I've already PROVED to you it WAS constitutional based on the constitution and the presidents absence !
and ......HIS ABSENCE WAS A CALL MADE BY PARLIAMENT WHO WERE EMPOWERED TO MAKE THAT CALL ......you are not
amazing to me that you imagine asserting something unsupported is enough ......HC rules do allow reporting for unsupported statements !

Expand

"...I've already PROVED to you it WAS constitutional based on the constitution and the presidents absence !..."
This is laughable.

So you're saying that if a president leave the country for a few days - that's reason enough to oust him and install another? LOOOOOOL
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 2,738 more messages in this thread...

First 216350 Last

SPONSORED BY