By failing to ever produce a single shred of evidence to support the Kremlin "coup" lie you are proving it well enough for me there was no coup.
The burden of proof is on YOU.
You are making the claim that the CIA was involved. Produce something, anything, that supports the Kremlin "coup" lie. Your constant repetition of the Kremlin "coup" lie, as we have seen your words time and time against to be detached from the truth, is simply not enough.
I see anyway you are switching up your blame story now from a CIA coup to a Ukrainian one because, according to you, the protests were not "peaceful" (the violence was almost exclusively AGAINST protestors not the other way) and that Yanukovych was threatened. Why the sudden change in "coup" responsibility? The CIA narrative not getting any traction because you can't prove they actually did anything?
A major indicator of a fabricated story is when fundamentals of the story changes. Changing who's "coup" it was is a serious fundamental change.
The truth has never changed, the facts that support there being no coup have not changed. The only thing changing is your fabricated Kremlin "coup" lie.
Who's "coup" will it be tomorrow? You never know your luck!
