I would say you can't be serious in trying to deny a Russian massacre of innocent Ukrainian civilians by Russian forces at Bucha, but you do the same with conclusively documented Serbian war crimes against innocent civilians, so no surprises from you there.
You are trying to establish a meaning for a word that fits the war crimes denial narrative you are desperately promoting. That word can have mean many different actions by a defending army, not only the actions you are trying to define.
The idea Ukraine were going around Bucha after Russian forces shooting Ukrainians is simply ridiculous, for one, it is just beyond ridiculous and secondly the false timeline you are subscribing to has already been debunked. Russian troops left, IMMEDIATELY after on April 1st video and photographic evidence emerges of Russian war crimes.
Here is a video from April 1st of a Bucha street full of Ukrainian victims of Russian war crimes:
Viktoriia on X: "My brother sent this to me. Town of Bucha northwest of Kyiv. The amount of dead citizens on one street alone…I just can’t even process. https://t.co/KOSwISih6N" / X
"Blood stains change colour very quickly and the bandages on those bodies were clean white with bright red stains. Not possible after 3 or 4 days and longer."
The "trust me I am suddenly a forensic expert" speaks! Amazing bit of scientific discovery for all of us there! I can only assume you think we are as intelligent as your normal lowest common denominator pro Kremlin pundit to think that statement has any validity.
So recapping your denials of conclusive evidence of a Russian massacre in Bucha, you have as "evidence":
- Your definition and pure speculation of the meaning of the word "cleansing" when you don't actually know how it was intended
- An incorrect timeline that wrongly assumes when evidence of Ukrainian victims of the Russian Bucha massacre were discovered
- Your own non medical expert opinion about what tone blood" should have after several days based on your incorrect timeline
And you want us to believe that eye witness testimony, video and photographic evidence, forensic evidence, open source evidence identifying which Russian units were involved, all of this conclusive evidence that shows Russian committed the Bucha massacre can be dismissed because you have a meaning for a word, an incorrect timeline and a guess as to what colour blood should be.
Who is the one who can't be serious.
