Originally posted by green potato:
↑
Hard to say, the poorer terrorist state of america becomes the more dangerous it is. And right now they r VERY POOR . Worse, they r facing elections in what would be the most divisive the terrorist state has been in their pathetic existence. ww1 and ww2 pretty much has 0 impact on the terrorist state of america.NONE of them were fought in american soil, sadly. pearl harbour is completely insignificant, its a couple of boats on an island, big deal really. Its not Stalingrad or Nanking. Its just europeans and Asians dropping like flies. Sure they lost a couple thousands of men, but really just expendable soldiers who meant nothing to the empire of lies. So there lies the question, is ww3 good or bad for them, given their trillion $ weapons industry and and trillions spent on soldiers who they cant use at all. ww3 looks pretty promising. Trillions upon trillions $ of hard earned european $ r flowing into their stock markets. They r getting hundreds billions $ of arms sales. They have worthless europe by the marbles. Their japs, koreans and philipine pawns r fully in control.ww3 hurts Great China. world peace is THE GREATEST THREAT to terrorist state of america. Their entire existence depends on war . Is ww3 gonna be fought in the americas? Big fat NO . Who cares who Putin nuked lol, as long as Russia dont nuke them, they dont nuke Russia. Simple as that. ww3 is starting to look like a very, very profitable business proposition for them. Hey look Putins is a baddie, I got couple hundreds billions $ of bombs here, wanna buy?
Expand
There's the rest of that interview there from three years ago.. The war against Russia is about energy security.The deflationary gap & death spirals In the penultimate chapter of his book, Grand Deception, Alex Krainer refers to a phenomenon known as the ‘deflationary gap’. Despite the fact that the deflationary gap led to the tragedy of two world wars, and is usually the pretext to wars in general, very little has been written […]