Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"The stronger nation gets to determine its "Security" needs,...

First 22486 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
spinner2

1,262 Posts.

33

22/04/22

16:44

Post #: 60974983
Share

Originally posted by Cosmoterios ↑

Both are wrong.

As I have said many times, its about strategic interest - nothing to do with emotive BS narratives.

The stronger nation gets to determine its "Security" needs, within its region.

It does not matter its in the Gulf of Mexico - in relation to US/Cuba; the Middle East vis-a-vis Israel/Syria-Iran, or Eastern Europe vis-a-vis Russia/Ukraine.

The Security interest of the Dominant country prevails in all these situations.

My original post was to point out that Russia had security concerns that Ukraine was going to attack them in Crimea as a result of:

Ukraine changing its Constitution to join Nato (getting circa 30 Nato nations to gang up on them), and

Zelenskyy signing a presidential decree to take back Crimea.

These two events represented a casus belli moment for Russia to take pre-emptive military actions, to protect its "Security" interests.

It would be the same if you replace the word "Russia" with the word "Israel" or the "US", in the above sentence.

Expand

"The stronger nation gets to determine its "Security" needs, within its region."- Animal Farm??- Pigs Rule; and Braying Jackasses Repeat the Mantra!
6 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 193,435 more messages in this thread...

First 22486 Last