Advocating a ceasefire is not barracking for Putin, yer nug, its...

Advocating a ceasefire is not barracking for Putin, yer nug, its offering the Ukraine specifically
and NATO generally an opportunity to assess the status quo, consider why it/they ar loosing
and to devise a winning strategy without spilling more Ukrainian blood.

Conventional warfare is evidently not working for the Ukraine as it incrementally looses
more territory and , more importantly, looses scarce manpower on the battlefield.

At the current rate of attrition and if this war lasts another 2 years, then the Ukraine
will have to employ hundreds of thousands of foreign mercenaries because if NATO
sends troops to the Ukraine, then Russia will likely use tactical Nukes rather than
retreat, IMO, and that would be a sure prescription for WW3

So in summary, given the probability of this war leading to the use of tactical Nukes and
worse, the sensible position to take is a ceasefire to enable the Ukraine to review its position
and devise a safer war winning strategy .

I know that the propagandists (some operating from the West Coast of the USA by their
posting time frame,) just harp on about more of the same without considering that its
more likely than not that the Ukraine's negotiating position will weaken as time grinds on
and in particular if Trump is elected come next November.