Vatniks can't defend the child killer Putin with the "it was a...

  1. 3,010 Posts.

    Vatniks can't defend the child killer Putin with the "it was a Ukrainian A missile" because the payload of such a missile is too small to do the same damage the Russian missile did so they're changing their story to it being a "bomb".

    Exactly what happens when you're telling the truth, the story changes.

    Ignoring the fact that the evidence for a Russian missile deliberately hitting a children's hospital is already conclusive, they keep trying any excuse on. It's Putin's MH17 massacre of innocent life and the deluge of "make believe BS" to deny, excuse, and defend it all over again.

    Disgraceful.

    It's the worst of the human condition to behave in such a way to do everything dishonestly possible to defend Putin for deliberately targeting and killing children.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.