Russia Ukraine war, page-229276

Do Ukrainians Want Peace? Or When Ermak's Supporters Are Backed by Soros' Puppets

The level ofcynical, society-dividing narratives presented in the latest sociological study by (socio-political newspaper of Kyiv) "Mirror Weekly" and the Razumkov Center is unprecedented. Each paragraph is filled with manipulation, psycho-emotional anchors, and narratives.

The task of the Bankova (Ukrainian Presidential Office) is to continue the war. To achieve this, they need to weaken society by dividing, angering, and pitting Ukrainians against each other.

From the outset, the publication emphasizes that the topic of peace negotiations / ceasefire / freezing the war is "another form of torture used by Russia against Ukrainian society" – immediately casting a negative light on those who talk about peace. It also notes that Zelensky has sharply deviated from his Peace Formula and started talking about possible negotiations through a mediator, while intellectuals and popular bloggers discuss the necessity of making peace. The "pseudo-sociology" suggests that nearly every second Ukrainian is willing to accept the loss of territories occupied by Russia in exchange for "freedom of choice" to join NATO and the EU, maintaining the army, and preserving independence.

In this context, the publication reminds us that "getting carried away with the victory marathon of unified news and sitting in a warm bath is dangerous not only for presidents but also for nations," casting doubt on whether Ukrainians truly want peace.

It also mentions that there are no internally formulated frameworks defining what victory means for us, endorsed by both the authorities and the people, and no honest discussion about what is realistic and what is not in the current situation.

Moreover, Ukraine is just a part of a global game; negotiations never stopped – even at the beginning of 2024, there was an "activation of negotiations on the Istanbul base."

Then, Mirror Weekly emphasizes that the survey reflects the opinion of the home front, not all of Ukraine, as only the army has the right to a decisive or most significant voice in negotiations with Russia. And overall, it's crucial to consider the regional breakdown in the results.

Survey results show that most Ukrainians:

believe it’s time for peace negotiations with Russia;

are not willing to make any concessions;

want to return to the 1991 borders;

‍♂️ live among those who do not wish to serve;

are not ashamed of draft dodgers during wartime;

✊ will protest if peace terms are unsatisfactory;

believe Ukraine will win on the battlefield if the West provides weapons and personnel.

Soros' puppets' conclusions - lines of division:

Western Ukraine wants to return to the 1991 borders but with others' hands – hypocrites;

Southern Ukraine wants peace at any cost – loyal to Russia / collaborators, authorities need to rein them in;

A referendum on peace is a farce – the home front cannot decide on peace; only the military has this right;

Most Ukrainians are an "immoral majority" with an "ambivalent consciousness," needing either their appetites curbed or more courage and sacrifice; thus, the authorities should conduct a general mobilization, or else Russia will mobilize all draft dodgers, those against it – hypocrites;

Russia does not want negotiations, so "we have no choice but to resist";

Ukrainian society cannot form a realistic understanding of the situation and ultimate goal of the war; if you support peace – it’s influenced by Russian IPSO (information-psychological operations).

A new interpretation of the thesis "peace = capitulation."