Russia Ukraine war, page-229313

  1. 22,440 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 769
    The rules based order was concocted by the USA immediately
    post WW2:
    The UN
    The IMF
    The World Bank
    The USD Global Reserve Status
    etc etc etc.

    In practice, however, the principle of
    "No country can bolster its National Security
    at the expense of another; particularly if
    that "another" is a Nuke Power Neighbour.

    My post above challenges that principle...ie:
    That if its OK or the Ukraine to bolster its
    national Security by joining NATO then
    why is it not OK for say Cuba or Venezuela
    to join the SCO and have Chinese/Russian
    WMDs based in their respective countries
    for national security purposes ?

    The principles that apply to the Ukraine
    joining NATO in this instance, apply to
    Cuba and Venezuela joining the SCO
    (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation)

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6315/6315895-8203ac9efca1d9663aaec4dce19573ed.jpg
    (source Wikipedia)

    IMO the SCO + BRI + BRICS will eventually challenge the
    US Rules Based Order and with it the role of the USA as
    being the global policeman and the role of the USD as
    the Global Reserve Currency.

    This Ukrainian War has to be looked at in this context
    and it has simply accelerated the process so while the
    Ukrainian war was a win for expanding NATO membership,
    it also accelerated the China led SCO, BRICS, SCO development
    and with it the formation of an international trading system
    excluding the USD and related institutions.(eg SWIFT etc)

    Last edited by moorookamick: Yesterday, 17:40
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.