@Lt RipleySorry Lucky, this is just an article made by someone...

  1. 6,042 Posts.
    @Lt Ripley

    Sorry Lucky, this is just an article made by someone who does not include the actual court ruling and who's findings have already been debunked. Their opinions based on their pro Putin position holds no weight in this argument that there was no coup in Ukraine.

    Nice deception try, just like your FT article that was really an RT article.

    Why can't you link to the court ruling Lucky? Why do you keep pushing someone's interpretation of the court ruling?

    Forensic evidence identified police snipers as the shooters. Fact.

    Yanukovych hired Titushky thugs to ferment violence. Fact. IMO they would be the party responsible for the bulk of the shooting at protestors and police.

    Sorry Lucky, baseless pro Kremlin conspiracy theories are just that.


    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6393/6393558-aa1380cc45c8793fd2c15b949c66615a.jpg
    Maidan casualties - Wikipedia



    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6393/6393563-0e30c101059d61f26b6195a61b493fd7.jpg
    Titushky - Wikipedia
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.