Share
8,398 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 14
clock Created with Sketch.
20/08/24
12:14
Share
Originally posted by tangs:
↑
whenever civillian infrastructre gets hit by a russ missile we see you : a) try to pretend it was Ukrainian b) try and pretend there was a legitimate target I doubt you even realise yourself just how subjective you are and how much you rationalsie I have pointed out ....for years now ....how immoral it is for russia to strike residential areas of cities nowhere near the front .....for me and most people that is pretty clear as terror strikes we know about the advantages russia has with arteillery , air supremacy and previously with the navy .....but the missiles and the gliding bombs are huge too .....how is it with all the advantages , and being four times the size of Ukraine that russia has accomplished so very little in Ukraine and had to rsort to trying to kill the morale of thje Ukrainioan people ??? (ONe pro russ poster here fealt the need to resort to inventing two NATO armies in Ukraine that russia had supposedly defeated to tryt and explain russias poor progress.) Another point I continually try to make is tht there have been a LOT more negatives from this war chosen by putin than positives ......even allowing for holding some of Ukraine ....a huge , particularly strategic negative ! I think this is something you are aware of but avoid fully admitting .......this war has NOT helped russia in terms of rusisas security .....but actually DAMAGED russ security .
Expand
Sometimes it has been Ukrainian - Kostyantynivka, Przewodow. Sometimes there was a legitimate target - Kramatorsk. I stand by my opinion that Russia has generally tried to avoid civilian casualties. This is changing the argument a bit, and your initial claim remains untrue:every time a hospital gets hit Olceg tries to pretend there were 300 NATO geberals in the basement
Last edited by
Okceg :
20/08/24