By "both actions: I mean engaging in explicit communication with underage children (Ritter's crime) and actual molestation of underage children, I recognised the difference you pointed out, admitted I was wrong. That's not lying Pimple.
So enough deflecting Pimple. Now, I want to know, are you excusing or condoning Ritter's behaviour?
Are the child sex crimes that Ritter was convicted of (twice) acceptable behaviour to you?
