Hi OK,IMO the UAF incursion into Russia is not alone risky,but...

Hi OK,

IMO the UAF incursion into Russia is not alone risky,
but it turns the Ukraine defensive war effort into
an offensive one which for many here is seen
as confirming Russia's phobia that the extension
of NATO to surround the Black Sea with NATO
members harbouring NATO WMDs aimed at Russia
is more offensive than defensive.

I'm in Europe at present and feedback indicates that
this escalation is not going down well
here because there's a fear that it may motivate
Russia to use tactical Nukes as foreshadowed.

Apart from that there are local concerns here that this war
is slowly driving Europe into recession while leaving the USA
Scott Free; but IMO the US will cop recession later once the
new Presidential Regime (whoever wins) hit Washington
early next year.

The other alternative is to continue this war to the last Ukrainian
standing and if NATO troops hit the ground in the Ukraine to compensate,
the local impression here seems to be that will be the lead-in into WW3
which at the moment China is not sufficiently geared-up for.


(source: bulletin.org)

There are many on this thread who assume that further successful incursions
by the UAF into Russia will bring down the Putin Regime or even the Russian State.

IMO they should think again...according to the above decree, the Putin Regime
is, more likely than not, to employ at least Tactical Nukes in the event
of Russia's "very existence is put under threat"