The same person who says “that’s not constitutional” and “that’s illegal” about a communist Yugoslav constitution forced on people without their say is the same person who says “UN and UN chief have got what relevance in today’s world exactly?” about a body countries are voluntarily a part of.
Mr constitution and legality when it suits you “two”.
It’s quite hypocritical to cry that the US and Nato violated the UN charter to prevent Serbian crimes against humanity (the worst since WW2) in one sentence and then defend Putin violating the UN charter to perpetrate crimes against humanity as depraved as Serbia’s in the next.
Consistency Lucky/Okceg, consistency.
The same person who says “that’s not constitutional” and “that’s...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9,870 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)