If it was about "the Land" your words, then why did Russia not...

  1. 22,764 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 769
    If it was about "the Land" your words, then why did Russia not take all
    of Georgia (it took 2 Georgian Oblasts in a week so the rest of Georgia then
    would have been a cake walk.......before NATO/US got their arses into gear!

    Similarily why did russia not take Moldova years ago rather than defacto taking
    Transnistra .

    IMO my theory fits all 3...IE: that Russia wants to create border disputes
    with all 3 which precludes them from joining NATO according to NATO's
    own membership prerequisites......which either 3 joining NATO was
    a red line for Russia due to the national security importance Russia
    places on the Red Sea/Sea of Azov.

    Russia has more land pickled with natural resources than it know what to do with.
    That said, China will be in there like Flynn post this war developing/extracting
    Russia's energy and metal resources thereby minimising its reliance on Aus.
    because we said that China is our #1 enemy and we have outlawed any Aus
    State from joining China's BRI
    Last edited by moorookamick: Yesterday, 23:09
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.