Wrong Mook.You're at least consistent at that.The Nato fantasy...

  1. 4,684 Posts.

    Wrong Mook.

    You're at least consistent at that.

    The Nato fantasy of Putin is a junk excuse. Putin lost political control of Ukraine in 2013 when his puppet abandoned the presidency and fled Ukraine and Putin has been trying (and failing abysmally) to militarily take control ever since.

    The Sec. State Baker at that time was not the president of the US and had no authority to approve such a decision on his own, on behalf of the US or in speaking for an entire alliance, in addition president Bush Sr at that time flat out rejected this condition,

    Even Gorbachev who was there said no such promises were made or agreed to.

    The only agreement signed, the Nato-Russia founding act signed in 1997, which specially declared all formerly affected countries had the freedom of self-determination in choosing alliances and international agreements. That is what was agreed to, not the entirely incorrect assertion you were trying to make.

    I don’t understand why you try to pass off such obvious Kremlin propaganda when it can be easily fact checked.

    Stop trying to pass of discussions as official policy and agreements.


    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6464/6464224-a58f03b6d816528f06e051d41c8a5020.jpg
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6464/6464228-4831c27dab67acc00ae3dfa2bd59598c.jpg
    Did NATO Promise Not to Enlarge? Gorbachev Says "No" (brookings.edu)




    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6464/6464221-1f15dc5b9c9fb78618f3a29c176524e5.jpg
    Not One Inch - Wikipedia





    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6464/6464231-0a7004655f79743531b1ec12d9982f3d.jpg
    ‘There was no promise not to enlarge NATO’ - Harvard Law School | Harvard Law School
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.