In war, its lead up and its aftermath the truth usually gives...

  1. 23,004 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 769
    In war, its lead up and its aftermath the truth
    usually gives way to propaganda....that is
    one cant rely on what is said but instead on what's
    done.

    IMO if Russia really wanted to expand empire rather
    than retain the use of Crimea as one of its chief naval
    ports & prevent the expansion of NATO, then it would have
    struck early 2014 when the UAF was weak and before
    NATO/US got in there to train/upgrade the UAF .

    Instead Russia awaited until there was definite
    moves by the Ukraine to join NATO as per
    the 2019 referendum to that effect and later
    confirmed by the general election that followed.

    And besides it would have made good sense
    for Russia to invade the Ukraine before the
    US/NATO exited Afghanistan.

    So unless that you think that Russia is stupid,
    then that circumstantial evidence would ,
    more likely than not, lead a reasonable person to
    conclude that Russia waited to see the outcomes
    of these elections and confirmation that Minsk 2 had collapsed
    before it invaded.

    IMO its invasion was delayed by 2 years due to Covid and war prep.

    Of course, we'll know for sure what both sides will forfeit for a negotiated
    peaceful settlement and given the current state of play both sides
    will likely have red lines based og that.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.