In war, its lead up and its aftermath the truth
usually gives way to propaganda....that is
one cant rely on what is said but instead on what's
done.
IMO if Russia really wanted to expand empire rather
than retain the use of Crimea as one of its chief naval
ports & prevent the expansion of NATO, then it would have
struck early 2014 when the UAF was weak and before
NATO/US got in there to train/upgrade the UAF .
Instead Russia awaited until there was definite
moves by the Ukraine to join NATO as per
the 2019 referendum to that effect and later
confirmed by the general election that followed.
And besides it would have made good sense
for Russia to invade the Ukraine before the
US/NATO exited Afghanistan.
So unless that you think that Russia is stupid,
then that circumstantial evidence would ,
more likely than not, lead a reasonable person to
conclude that Russia waited to see the outcomes
of these elections and confirmation that Minsk 2 had collapsed
before it invaded.
IMO its invasion was delayed by 2 years due to Covid and war prep.
Of course, we'll know for sure what both sides will forfeit for a negotiated
peaceful settlement and given the current state of play both sides
will likely have red lines based og that.
- Forums
- World Politics
- Russia Ukraine war
In war, its lead up and its aftermath the truth usually gives...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,158 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)