The argument for UAF invading Russia: (a) to divert russian troops away from the Ukrainian battlefront affording the UAF an advantage on the battle front (b) to cut off some Russian supply lines to the battlefront thereby weakening Russian assault/defences on the battlefront (c) to use the conquested Russian territory as a bargaining chip should there be future peace negotions
Outcome so far:????
You say (otherwise the deniers on this thread would attack with their usual accusations or being pro-Russia rather than being factual/neutral/realistic .
If (a) then the UAF should be regaining Ukrainian territory
If (b) then the UAF should be regaining Ukrainian territory
If (c) then the Ukraine expects a negotiated settlement rather than its original objective of regaining all lost territory.
Q: How much territory has Russia gained in the Ukraine since UAF invaded Russia? . If more than Russia has gained on the battlefront has gained in the interim, then the Ukraine is winning with respect to (c)
