Some irrelevant opinion piece that simply rep[eats known Kremlin lies and propaganda slogans is not evidence of CIA involvement.
Nuland does not even work for the CIA so it is rather strange of you to include an immaterial inconsequential phone call of someone who does not even work for the CIA as evidence of CIA involvement.
Just worthless irrelevant fiction that is in no way shape or form proof the CIA did anything.
Do you know why you'll never produce anything remotely credible here? it is simply because the CIA was not involved.
