More rational explanation IMO is that previous incurred tax losses can only be used if the majority of ownership remains at 50% plus 1 share when the nature and business structure change. If this drops below 50% then tax losses can not be used anymore. This is an anti-tax avoidance rule.
EG if company has 40M in tax losses and nature & business structure change and original ownership is reduced to 50% minus one share, the 40M tax losses are lost.
If next year 40 M profit is made, then 30 % tax will need to be paid, if tax losses are available tax will be $0, as previous losses are soaked up first.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RYG general topics
More rational explanation IMO is that previous incurred tax...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 637 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RYG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online