How many mine accidents resulting in loss of life has there been at Co-O in the past 5 years? 3.
Will there be an investigation into this accident? Yes.
Is the company to blame in any case? We need to see the results.
MH17 crash in East Ukraine cames to mind here. Within hours and for weeks later it was the fault of the 'rebels' or Ruskies and Western media was certain Putin was to blame. This with no evidence or investigation. For months now the subject has been dropped by the MSM like a hot potato. Wonder why?
Underground miners have a difficult and dangerous job. Accidents happen. Some are preventable, some are not but some posting here are certain Medusa is to blame. Forget about fairness. These 'experts' know it's the company's fault.
Medusa Mining: Coping with Complexity1
Monday October 13, 2014, 6:20pm PDT
By
bgeorge2+1 - Exclusive to
Gold Investing News3
4Medusa Mining (ASX:MNL5) announced6 last week that it reached its quarterly gold production target of 21,015 ounces at its Philippines operations, and is on track to achieve its half-year target of between 40,000 and 45,000 ounces. Although viewed positively by the market, in the context of struggling gold prices and general market malaise, the news had little positive impact on the company’s share price.
Like many mid-cap miners in recent times, Medusa has struggled with high costs and operational underperformance, but also like many of its peers, it seems to be coming to grips with its issues. The bleeding seems to have stopped, but improvements need to be seen.
The third quarter of 2013 leading into mid-2014 was not a stellar time for Medusa. Mill problems in late 2013, heavy rains and flooding in early 2014, underground fatalities, cost overruns, major restructurings and ongoing struggles with geological complexity weighed upon the company’s reputation, ultimately leading to the sudden departure of the CEO in August 2014.
New CEO cleans up
The new CEO wasted no time in stamping his authority, and on September 1
appointed8 a consulting engineering team charged with conducting a comprehensive review of the company’s entire Co-O gold-mining operation.
Three major issues were flagged as being of primary concern for the review:
- The mill had consistently underperformed, with several major components operating below expectations.
- The narrow, high-grade veins had proven more complex and unpredictable than first thought, resulting in large variances in head grade and dilution.
- The geological complexity, coupled with a move to the newer 2012 JORC code, had made necessary a rework of the company’s resource and reserve base that most likely would significantly reduce total ounces.
Essentially, Medusa had to come to grips with a complex orebody. The new executive team wiped the slate and canceled all medium-term production targets beyond the next two quarters to allow itself time to assess and plan its next moves.