I must be missing something as I read the ann. We see a...

I must be missing something as I read the ann. We see a reference to 539g/t at the beginning and after that no further mention of that figure.

In Table 1 the highest figure per ton is 202.08g/t so how did they come to the figure of 539g/t. It seems to me that some spin is being applied to the data presented and we are jumping on the wrong figure for calculating value of the find.

If I were to average out all of the sample results from the last column of Table 1 (ann 17/3) then I would be looking at a figure of 558/7 = 79.77 g/t.

Sorry if this is completely wrong and if so please explain why?????