LMax must be important. To LIT. Why? SL is a step forward from LMax. Just read the previous LIT promotion material concerning SL. So why would LIT propose to use LMax if a superior product is already in their stable. That is not logical at all. Why would they dilute their shareholders to buy a process that they would not have a use for?
Unless. Unless SL in practice does not meet the theoretical hype. Unless the yields are not as good. Unless the quality is not as good. Unless there is tail end problems with the waste. Unless the economics do not add up. Oh and of course they have been caught out with the legalities. Then different logic changes the importance.
Say NO to TO!, page-75
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 68 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $1.388K | 694.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | 77284360 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 66924077 | 51 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.10am 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LPD (ASX) Chart |