say what?, page-6

It mentions that there have been shale gas shows in a well drilled in a neighbouring permit which is NOT a DOG permit.
It DOESN'T say DOG "HAVE SHALE GAS"! That's just you with your deliberately misleading comments NOT the document YOU CITED. No well records on DOG permits and NO reserves certified on DOG permits. Do you understand those simple facts? (Obviously not!) EITHER of those things would show DOG HAS shale gas, but what you have cited doesn't.

How about you just admit that you are deliberately misrepresenting the facts? I suggested you show us ANY document which supports your assertion but you can't do that, can you sport? And why is that?

Here's the explanation! There is no such document. All there is is a documented you cited which refers to a native title agreement and, en passant, mentions a well on a non-DOG permit.

So, how about admitting YOU'VE misrepresented the situation for whatever reason like a grown-up?

TR