some rau holders in the past worked out that mt c from historical figures would generate 25mil per year in revenue before costs. these are only historical figures but its not enough to make the project a company maker. it still worth pursuing to generate cash flow and save on further dilution in the future but its ww that has the potential. but that is a long way off. rau need to concentrate on 1-3 projects otherwise they will just consume any funds they have and will have to put their hand out too often. also imo they will need to extend both the resource and mill throughput at mt c which could mean more funds but its money well spent. this is what i'm waiting to see.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BIG
- sb2000...nana and the other embarressed ones
sb2000...nana and the other embarressed ones, page-27
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online