No need to be insulting I know the difference between CG and TG and was not ignoring it. I had simply noted that the "shareholder’s letter on MET tests" used those Albemarle TG specs to compare to their proposed CG product, IMO from the point of view that they could achieve 6% LiO2 at coarser grinds. I saw no reason not to draw similar, reasonable inferences in relation to FFX's proposed CG product from the point of view of grain size.
I also noted the following on p3 of that same report
Further, I could not find any SC 6 or SC 6.1 specs referred to in that report explicitly stating the desired grain sizes in a way that the Albermarle TG specs did. The "palith" document you provided the link for is in chinese so I could not determine anything re SC 6 & SC 6.1 from it. Similarly, internet searches for SC 6 and SC 6.1 specs yielded nothing.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FFX
- SC6 fines
SC6 fines, page-50
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
SBW
Shekel Brainweigh reports a 50% revenue increase in its Retail Innovation suite and delivers the first batch of 20 Smart Bays to Hitachi as part of a larger order
BM8
Learn of the ASX-listed company that is well-placed to respond to the future global energy demand
Add FFX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
JBY
JAMES BAY MINERALS LIMITED
Andrew Dornan, Executive Director
Andrew Dornan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online