Trump has released the partial transcripts that supports what the whistleblower has said, so what transpired on the call is already on the record.
The other witnesses and documents being collected will be far more insightful in getting to the bottom of the matter, than the whistleblowers testimony,
The whistleblower was just the door opener for the investigation, the evidence will come from others.
"....so what happened to confronting your accuser?..."
I'm sure you are not that naive as to not know the difference between an inquiry and a trial, so why make meaningless statements that have no relevance to the actual process that is going on.
- Forums
- World Politics
- Schiff: ‘May not be necessary’ for whistleblower to testify
Schiff: ‘May not be necessary’ for whistleblower to testify, page-4
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Iggy Tan, Executive Chairman
Iggy Tan
Executive Chairman
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online