''The point I was making, a few lines into reading up the understanding of gravity, you have to divert to another theory, understanding and this this type of thing goes on and on and on.''
You weren't making a point. You said - ''OH,,,,,,, doesn't that have a familiar ring to it. Science and a play of words = they are the inventors of it'' - and when I asked for an example you gave gravity but offered no explanation.
''Now I would have thought, the basics of gravity could be summed up relatively quick without having to go to numerous other rot things.''
Well, you happen to think wrong. The basics of gravity, that things fall to Earth may seem simple enough, but how this happens is a different story. Which is basically why your example fails.
