Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

What form would this censorship take? And who would be the...

First 6 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
josimar

2,568 Posts.

47

06/08/20

14:27

Post #: 46349910
Share

Originally posted by NavyDiver: ↑

Not me. I am not a scientist Josimar. Many well known Alternative processes are perfectly acceptable to consider. Religion for one. Believe as you like. Not a problem with me at all. Religion and contraception is a religious discussion not a science based one as an example I think we can all agree? We can all easily read as much opinion and links to questionable information we want. Questioning the information is as you point out a form of science.

I would like a little moderation to a standard similar to the two social media names I mentioned. Would "Questioning usually accepted Science and Medicine" be a forum you would like? Not trying to stop people asking. I would like accountability for the people or countries who knowingly promote false information.

Expand

What form would this censorship take? And who would be the censor?

Would you have censored the ‘wacky’ views of those that claim stomach ulcers are not caused by poor diet and stressful lifestyle?
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...

First 6 Last