science rules, page-30

Those who extol the virtues of interferring in others' privates quite often seem to conceal rather contradictory personal practices - I guess it's a defensive trick.

Scream "evil" loud enough and people look away from what's right before their eyes ;)

And yes, his eyes looked seriously demented to me, his pose and tone were aggressive, he invaded Dawkin's personal space, suggesting extreme discomfort and defensiveness. It led me to ponder whether the more one relies on faith to protect the abandonment of faulty logic, the more aggressively one would be prepared to defend it - even to kill to protect one's hideously erroneous edifice. Hence Dawkins' stance.

Re infinite chances and infinite outcomes - my mum who was a mathematician used to tease me with the logical result of those infinite outcomes - somewhere, far far away in a distant galaxy, there is someone a lot like me who is typing this same post only they will end their post here.

And I will end it here.

Maybe.

;)