P.S. I am sectorI don't believe you. I don't think its funny you...

P.S. I am sector

I don't believe you. I don't think its funny you pretending. I think its in incredibly poor taste. And shows terrible judgement.

Legally and morally I think the person behind the nick truss20 has never been the person behind the nick that was sector or sectorlead or any of the series of nicks I think he used. But you did tick his ad hominem from time to time.

And morally I do think you are aligning and associating yourself with that person NOW including association yourself with the miss behaviors of that person. I think you are aiding and abetting the person (normalising the abuse of a internet discussion forum and corrupting and making a false market more false and less of a true market) that was sector modus operandi but you aren't the same person in my opinion. You are just aligned in your values or rather lack of in my opinion.

I don't hate sector and I don't hate you. But I genuinely believes sectors behavior on forum of attacking other posters was harmful to the site, to other people, to critical thinking and share holders cooperation to get better accountability from directors and to the proper operation of free markets as opposed to false markets.

ASIC came down on fibonarchery eventually, I think they would have come down on sector and maybe closed down the site if sector had continued as he was acting on site. I was preparing evidence to participate in helping to make that happen if I had the chance - if he didn't stop and he wasn't stopping - not because I hate sector or think he is somehow particularly unusual - he was just one of the most extreme serial abusers of other posters - attacking people who didn't even do anything to him - like wasa to name just one of many - just to shut them up - and he was like a metastasizing example of abusing other posters to silence there views - working and growing as a destructive normalisers of abuse as tactic.

Because of the way you behave - this "I am sector stuff" - I think you'd be only about as reliable morally as philby - you'd flip (morally) for the money.

I do believe in free speech. But there is nothing I can say - no arguments I can make - that can stop the moral decisions of anyone else to attack the poster not engage the argument. Those that can see the arguments when the arguments are hard are always rare - so I need - to have any chance to have a fair go myself (to get arguments heard by ASX, ASIC, courts etc) - to align myself with others who have a moral code - they won't take the bribes. They won't sell their values for the money.