gcadenaz, tempted not to debate with anybody who uses terms like "100000% incorrect!!!" but I'll put that down to youthful exuberance.
In your earlier post you make the mistake of 'adjusting' data to fit in with seasonal variations and permanently 'changing' data which the BoM have been proven to do.
"Scientists change raw data all the time". No
This is never, ever done in reputable organisations.
You can 'adjust' data to run models, you can 'correct' data to test theories but it is only in the ridiculously politicised field of 'climate science' that people permanently change raw data.
This make it impossible to ever know what the situation was on a historical basis. I guess that it why they do it. Better to have inaccurate data that fits your models than models which fit accurate data.
