Beretta, you told the truth as "skeptics" see it . Fair enough. For example the judgement by the court was a very long document, and I can cherry pick, too:
i) It is substantially founded upon scientific research and fact, albeit that the science is used, in the hands of a talented politician and communicator, to make a political statement and to support a political programme.
"The Film advances four main scientific hypotheses, each of which is very well supported by research published in respected, peer-reviewed journals and accords with the latest conclusions of the IPCC:"
"Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate."
As far as I know, he never stated a time frame for the 20 foot rise. I will try to watch the file again and verify this.
Do some more homework, yourself. Don't worry about me.
Beretta, you told the truth as "skeptics" see it . Fair enough....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 85 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)