Sea levels, page-78

I got a reply email from Daniel,
He confirmed that this part,

"BBCand ABC commentators have asserted that sea levels may permanently rise by 1 to2 metres in the next 100 years. 100 years of records on the largest water bodyon Earth indicates that this is incorrect."
was in his document how @pints must have change "BBC and ABC" from "I'll informed media"

Daniel has also doubled down on commiting a '*** and Gamblers Fallacy', which invalidates his assertions of

"1 to 2 metre rise in sea level in the next 100 years is unlikely."

I guess this is why this is a thought piece rather than a submission to a journal.

Below is the correspondance.

Greetings ****,

I am pleased to attach our article on Sea Levels which contains the Bureau of Meteorology link to the data source.

You are welcome to disseminate the article in its entirety.

The dates and the references are important. The minor and regular changes in Mean Sea Level are mainly due to low pressure troughs and the larger planets in their elliptical orbits.

The recorded data makes it clear that a 1 to 2 metre rise in sea level in the next 100 years is unlikely.

Kind regards,​