see an agenda here, page-53

nro again go and read the references I have supplied continually, for example the fact that kvanefjeld is refractory I gave four references including one from the guy you named part of the deposit after

Saying their are 100 year old references and actually supplying them are two different things. So when will you be supplying them or are you afraid we will find them lacking in substance....again.

or the fact kvanefjeld does not make the top 5 in terms of size, again supplied the references which someone on this web site agreed with but you admitted you did not read

We have all heard this isnt true from the smartest on the planet when it comes to REEs. But yet you offer nothing but a statement it isnt and you are right. I dont see any other reference. So you have none correct?

here are over 2000 scientific publications on this deposit they are unbias and I can assure you that the professional staff of GGG depend 100% on such work.
Luckily we dont need to trust in your assurances based upon your 6 errors in honesty in just a few days.
None of these ficticious reports you claim exist do. As how many times you have been caught misleading people and unable to substantiate them when asked.
Very poor behavior really. How will you ever get support from shareholders to entrust your audit you think doing this?