As a farmer's son who was favoured in a will because the farm was unviable split 4 ways and son's were treated differently then, I do have a view. Children weren't always treated equally, in fact it was unusual until this last generation. So forgive me not assuming things should be equal.
If you assume the landholding son wants the parent's block then then I guess you would allow some sort of time arrangement for him to pay the other siblings off. That still probably favours the land holder, so there still remains a bias.
It comes back to the parent's attachment to the land. If they made it purely commercial, then retaining the parent's block may be unrealisable.
