Tech stuff on Caesium formate – a bit long I know but might interest a few..
Both field experience and research show that fluids based on caesium and potassium formate brines are among the best shale-compatible water-based drilling and completion fluids available
Answering Borehole Stability Challenges In Difficult Shale
Siv Howard, Cabot Specialty Fluids
Thursday, February 1, 2018 - 6:00am
Shale-related problems continue to be one of the largest sources of nonproductive time and trouble cost during well construction. Operational problems range from bit-balling and cuttings dispersion to full-scale stuck drillstring and casing events because of wellbore caving and collapse. Problems manifest themselves mostly when using water-based muds (WBM) and can often be sidestepped by using oil-based mud (OBM) and synthetic-based mud (SBM).
The latter, however, come with their own set of drawbacks, including complicated offshore skip-and-ship operations, difficulties obtaining electrical/resistivity logs, high waste disposal costs, a low threshold for lost circulation through induced fractures, incompatibility with Portland cement, etc. Moreover, these muds do not perform well on fractured shale formations. It is therefore still highly desirable to identify water-based alternatives to OBM/SBM.
Naturally compatible
Both field experience and research show that fluids based on cesium and potassium formate brines are among the best shale-compatible water-based drilling and completion fluids available. Unlike other waterbased drilling and completion fluids, the shale-stabilizing properties of formate fluids are attributable to the inherent properties of the formate brine itself, rather than to additives. This has the great advantage that the shale-stabilizing properties do not deplete with time, and no complicated and/or expensive additive maintenance is required.
First, cesium (and to a lesser extent potassium) ions have a low level of hydration in solution, and the effective “shell” of water molecules they carry around them is easily removed. When such ions exchange at clay sites in shales, they can effectively shield the water-structuring negative potential of the clay platelets, while at the same time avoiding ion hydration/solvation stress buildup.
This allows these “inhibitive” ions to heavily reduce the swelling pressure acting in the clay fabric, delivering important benefits that range from the ability to avoid bit-balling and cuttings disintegration all the way to preventing clay swelling and fines mobilization in hydrocarbon- bearing reservoirs.
Stabilizing effect
Cesium and potassium formate fluids exhibit remarkable qualities for stabilizing wellbores in shale formations as confirmed by both detailed laboratory studies as well as field applications. Contrary to popular belief, wellbore instability has little to do with clay swelling.
Wellbores typically destabilize, irrespective of mud type and formulation, when the wrong mud pressure is applied. However, even when the correct mud pressure is used shale formations may still destabilize over time due to mud pressure transmission driven by mud overbalance. Pressure transmission “charges” the near-wellbore pore pressure in shale rocks, creating instability in near-wellbore zones with associated borehole caving and enlargement over time, and a plethora of knock-on problems that include stuck pipe, poor casing runs, poor cement displacement causing poor cement jobs and insufficient zonal isolation.
Formate fluids offer two main mechanisms to slow down—and in some cases even avoid—pressure transmission. First, concentrated formate solutions have high filtrate viscosity. This slows Darcy flow into the shale that causes the detrimental near-wellbore pore pressure elevation. Second, concentrated formate solutions generate high osmotic pressures opposite shales with lowersalinity pore fluids, allowing hydraulic flow into the shale to be offset by osmotic flow out of the shale if the shale acts as an osmotic membrane.
Offshore shale case study
How good the shale-stabilizing qualities of formate fluids are in comparison with other muds was shown recently in a comparative mud evaluation conducted on behalf of Maersk Oil. The company had been suffering from time-delayed wellbore instability problems in the Lark/Horda shale formation that was intersected while drilling Tor/Ekofisk wells in the Danish sector of the North Sea.
Drilling with either conventional WBM or OBM resulted in a limited trouble-free openhole time of only three to five days before the well started to cave and wellbore enlargement commenced. This resulted in operational problems ranging from trouble backreaming out of the hole and running casing to irreversible stuck pipe and necessity to sidetrack.
In a series of competitive tests, a 13.5-parts-per-gallon-mixed cesium/ potassium formate fluid showed minimum shale accretion and excellent cuttings integrity in dispersion testing. The fluid distinguished itself in particular, however, during pressure transmission tests and borehole collapse tests where it stood apart from all other muds, including new commercial high-performance WBM (HP-WBM) formations and modified OBM formulations.
Figure 1 shows the comparative pressure transient testing results, showing the formate fluid to be in a league of its own in its ability to delay the onset of instability caused by pressure transmission, with delay factors that were more than five times larger than those observed for the best HP-WBM systems. The formate fluid also delivered the strongest wellbore during the borehole collapse tests.
Faster ROP with formate fluids
These results are fully validated by field experiences with formate fluids. Wells drilled from the late 1990s by Agip, Statoil, Kerr McGee and others all have shown excellent wellbore integrity in shales after extended periods of openhole time. These operators also observed a significant increase in ROP when comparing formate fluids to both conventional WBMs as well as OBM/SBM systems. This was most clearly demonstrated by a large number of wells drilled by Encana and others in the Montney Shale in Canada, where a potassium formate fluid drilled on average 30% to 40% faster in the shale than OBM systems
................
Feedback from users of caesium formate – Extracts from SPE papers Well control
Multiple other notes from multi companies early days 1994 - 2004 too large to print and also protected research.
• “No well control or loss situation” • “Extremely good well control environment” • “No sag potential”
• “Elimination of gas diffusion into horizontal wells” • “Well stabilises quickly during flow checks”
• “Unique track record: 15 HPHT wells drilled and completed with cesium formate brine without one well control incident” Feedback from users of cesium formate – Extracts from SPE papers Hydraulics • “ECD is SG 0.04 – 0.06 (0.30 – 0.50 ppg) lower than OBM”
• “Reduced ECD improved ROP in hard formations”
• “Fast tripping speeds”
• “ECDs higher when drilling clay than when drilling sand” Lubrication
• “Torque values indicate friction factors as low as 0.22”
• “No need to add lubricants” • “Low torque and drag” Feedback from users of cesium formate – extracts from SPE papers Hole stability and cleaning
• “Good hole stability in interbedded sand and shales” • “Good hole stability” • “Caliper log of 8-1/2” hole shows 9” in shale sections..”
• “Good hole cleaning” • “Wash-outs up to 20” in 8-1/2” hole at 45o inclination”
• “Even after a few weeks of open hole, hole sizes over 9.5” have been very rare” Differential sticking • “Low potential for differential sticking”
• “No incidence of stuck pipe” Formate brines and formation damage – conclusions from literature review (SPE 97694) Every * published field case history from the 1994-2004 period shows that production rates were equal to or higher than expectations after using formates
• No significant skins
• Recorded production increases of up to +600% compared with offsets or expectations • No stimulation required *
• “No incidence of stuck pipe” Formate brines and formation damage – conclusions from literature review (SPE 97694) Every * published field case history from the 1994-2004 period shows that production rates were equal to or higher than expectations after using formates
• No significant skins
• Recorded production increases of up to +600% compared with offsets or expectations • No stimulation required
Ends. DYOR
