Ur right about my agenda which is to ensure that Australians become aware of its intent, don’t get conned into losing their freedom of expression simply to placate a religious group.
Possibly the correct word should be stifled which is the aim of the IHRA guidelines….legal experts have come to that conclusion.
Including the original Jewish author/drafter of the guidelines who is condemning its usage and he supports other legal minds in their conclusions.
The only conclusion that I can draw from ur reaction, including 822, is that both of u cannot draft anything form of criticism towards Israel that isn’t deemed antisemitism.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Segal vs Robertson
Segal vs Robertson, page-89
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)