selling stopped, page-9

Can you please share with us your sources of information, calculations and assumptions which lead you to pronouncing, as fact not opinion, that one deal will lead to revenue of $10's of millions? At what net profit margin?

1. AGM (which you didn't travel the short journey to attend). Minimum revenue per locker bank was revealed as was profit margin.

2. Australia Post media release stating that another 29 super stores would be constructed with parcel lockers by 30 June, with up to 300 eventually.




Can you advise us the point in time at which net return from TZ's activities will at least cover the remuneration of our part-time directors?

Once again, if you'd traveled the short journey to the AGM, perhaps you could have asked the question during the Q&A session.




Oh, by the way - don't assume that any poster with a negative view of TZ has an ulterior motive. You're giving us an insight into what's driving YOUR posts.

I don't. But you repeatedly attacking the company from all angles (pay, patents, trials etc) and now also throwing in warnings about capital raisings and market conditions, reads like somebody who is trying to pull out all of the stop to prevent people from buying.

Why have you been silent for almost 1 year but recently become very active with no thought to wait 3 weeks to see the outcome of what is by far the most important and public trial that TZ has ever taken part in?

Surely you can see why your increasing activity is regarded with suspicion.

If wise and very concerned investors are so convinced of a lower share price, then why aren't wise and concerned investors selling a single share?




But I like to keep reminding TZ's directors and executive team that they're IMO close to running out of chances, are under intense scrutiny.

But like the rest of the disgruntled minority, just not at the AGM. Funny that.