NVA 14.7% 14.5¢ nova minerals limited

Sensitivities, page-7

  1. 5,846 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1419
    My reasoning:

    The JORC promoted the bulk resource as 0.15g/t, but the SS achieved the results it did by using 0.25g/t cut-off.

    With the level of indicated where is was, 0.25g/t was necessary.

    0.15g/t may become viable in the future studies, eg. if the inferred gets upgraded, and the strip ratio improves.


    Also, the sensitivities analysis was created to match the SS, which used 0.25g/t. So the sensitivities would be inaccurate if using 0.15g/t cut-off.


    Hopefully 0.15g/t would become viable, as that should mean that cost per tonne of reducing in future studies (lower cost would make lower grade ore viable). I'm assuming Fort Know is more drilled out, and having some kind of better metrics, like strip ratio or size.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add NVA (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
14.5¢
Change
-0.025(14.7%)
Mkt cap ! $35.31M
Open High Low Value Volume
17.5¢ 17.5¢ 12.5¢ $227.1K 1.494M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 55396 14.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
17.0¢ 20000 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
NVA (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.