NVA nova minerals limited

Sensitivities, page-7

  1. 7,108 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1808
    My reasoning:

    The JORC promoted the bulk resource as 0.15g/t, but the SS achieved the results it did by using 0.25g/t cut-off.

    With the level of indicated where is was, 0.25g/t was necessary.

    0.15g/t may become viable in the future studies, eg. if the inferred gets upgraded, and the strip ratio improves.


    Also, the sensitivities analysis was created to match the SS, which used 0.25g/t. So the sensitivities would be inaccurate if using 0.15g/t cut-off.


    Hopefully 0.15g/t would become viable, as that should mean that cost per tonne of reducing in future studies (lower cost would make lower grade ore viable). I'm assuming Fort Know is more drilled out, and having some kind of better metrics, like strip ratio or size.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
26.0¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $102.6M
Open High Low Value Volume
26.0¢ 27.0¢ 25.0¢ $190.4K 740.9K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 9633 26.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
26.5¢ 76076 2
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
NVA (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.