sentenced to death for atheism - Guess which religion, 16514428, page-148 - HotCopper | ASX Share Prices, Stock Market & Share Trading Forum

Originally posted by RM ↑

I did state from my experience with regards to atheism and modern discoveries in science only reinforces this view. But is that actually surprising that science has become the evolutionists worst nightmare.

The difference is even though the atheist accepts the profoundly absurd odds of a time chance only universe I do not demand people not to express such atheistic evolutionary fantasies on others.

Although it grinds against the sensibilities again I do not demand or believe one must respect modern science as a prerequisite to follow such a faith in a matter and energy only reality.

Baring in mind the historical pursuit of what we call modern science comes from a Christian world view.

Within a theological debate Christianity finds understanding and reason in the world as a worthwhile pursuit. Employing tools such as science although narrow in focus is tremendously useful.

As for rationality within a philosophical debate atheism grasp of rationality is tenuous at best.

The atheist is forced to hold onto the rational originated from the irrational. That all that is interpreted through such a mind has its origins in the opposite including logics generated by such a mind and trusted by it to be rational.

Compared to Christianity our minds and our origins of though are somewhat different, far less flimsy a concept to hold onto.

We have been given a rational mind by a rational creator.

The atheistic position is that rationality came from essentially the irrational
That logic is the product of irrational ontology.

Yep oil and water it just does not mix too well holding onto such a presupposition that the rational miraculously came from the irrational

then relying on its very existence as validity to draw conclusions from.

.

Expand

A lot of words again. Atheist doesn't agree with anything you have written In fact an atheist may have a far more fact based argument to all your word regurgitation Why do you feel the need to defend your belief? You attacked atheists belief many times, why? Why do you single out atheist belief? How do you feel tjukurrpa? This is my belief it goes against yours. Will you tell me how superior Christianity is to my belief? It is not my position to tell you that you are wrong, why must you seek to destroy mine or others beliefs? I have many atheist, agnostic, muslim friends. It is not good conversation to argue why a muslim shouldn't worry and just eat some pork. It's not good conversation to tell an atheist he must prepare his mind for an after life. It is not good conversation to argue that Christian that it was wrong for holy crusades on muslim populations. Unfortunately my people's culture is easily diluted by white man's belief and understandings through science. I have a same support for atheist as I do for, other religions. But when religious or atheist people get up on their soap box and tell everyone they are the only ones whose beliefs are correct it comes across very ignorant. Your posts are full of judgement. You can keep on seeking to take my post as an attack and then regurgitate endless lines of your opinion extracted from other like minded peoples opinion, then go to sleep satisfied that you are always right, that your thinking is flawless. That your belief is unshakable. Then why do you seek to defend it? It is this trait of the ignoramous that draws people to question. Genuine questions that the ignoramous feels compelled to refute and deflect. Your life will always be about defending and attacking. You are very much ignoramous I am very sorry to tell you again. You would not be welcome to any of my peoples dream time stories with your judgemental attitude peace and love, blessed be thy father