Serious question re/ AVL and TMT, page-11

TMT holder here. I have viewed all the video interviews with Ian, and I don't recall hearing him making those comments regarding their PFS release (do you recall which one?). I agree with you that if it was the case it is out of line and probably foolish as anything can happen to either companies between now and even the start of construction, let alone longer term, so absolutely ridiculous to gloat over release times of PFS. I actually recall a photo on social media of the two posing with each other recently, so I imagine they are pretty friendly to be honest.
There is the odd poster on both TMT and AVL forums making snide remarks about the other company as if they are opposition of each other. Once again, totally ridiculous. What is good for one is good for the other. If you guys use more conservative numbers for your PFS and still achieve a good outcome then that's great as it will most likely mean the same is achievable for TMT at lower v2o5 prices, just as TMT's numbers are for you guys if v2o5 prices are up still up around that $13 mark come time of production.
They both have great deposits and management, what doesn't help the **anintha Brothers are companies (KR *cough* C, H* cough cough *DY etc.) confusing potential investors to the vanadium sector with outlandish remarks and bragging about grade in concentrate, among other things.
I reckon you guys should just ignore the few TMT holders that come over here trying to bait you guys, we know who I'm talking about, as they are a minority, the majority of us realise that any good news from either company is good for the other, and slagging each other off isn't going to help. As both PLS and AJM did we can both get to production working alongside eachother, even helping each other out from time to time where it can be beneficial to both parties.