ISX statement of claim released 5.12.19 on page 3 suggests that any suspension should only be in relation to current compliance and not historical matters (ie) performance shares.
PARTICULARS
The terms were implied by operation of law.5. Further, by reason of the matters set out in paragraph 4 above, ASX’s power to suspend the shares of ISX from quotation on the Australian Securities Exchange:
(a) was, and is, to be exercised for the purpose of ensuring current compliance with the Listing Rules so that the market is being operated in accordance with its operating rules; and
(b) was, and is, not to be exercised for the purpose of punishing ISX in respect of alleged historical compliance issues.
Is this merely ISX’s legal interpretation or do they have a signed contract to that affect which strengthens ISX case against ASX?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Serious question: Why is the ASX investigation 14 months after performance share are met and distributed?
Serious question: Why is the ASX investigation 14 months after performance share are met and distributed?, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO
Anthony Noble
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online