None, literally none. The ASX has listing rules and stand to enforce them. There are also other requirements by law, ASIC, etc. Beyond that there is no other protection for investors. It is entirely up to individual investors to do their own due diligence, which is something that you had failed to do based on what you said:
You admittedly invested in a company that you have no idea about.
You said:
Well you knew the risk and the risk came true. It is your fault, no one elses.
Sure, fair enough.
This is what the ASX announced:
That quote there is the hard fact.
You accused the ASX of lying? ASIC later confirmed that they weren't consulted by the ASX? I am sorry but that is a serious FALSE ACCUSATION based on no evidence but a personal imagined one.
The ASX stated in the SOR:
From that, it was ASIC themselves who provided info and expressed concerns about ISX's books and records. ASIC also advised the ASX that they were considering launching a formal investigation into ISX' disclosure...
ASIC is currently investigating the same matters that the ASX is investigating based on COURT SUBMISSION by ISX themselves:
So the correct facts are out there but instead of getting them, you instead imagined your own?????? Why????
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Serious question: Why is the ASX investigation 14 months after performance share are met and distributed?
This is what the ASX announced:That quote there is the hard...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 115 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online