And I suppose that the 100% watertight fact (which doesn't rely on hairsplitting) that she was happy to have it on her CV for 2 years (no previous denial or "setting the record straight)
before suddenly finding she needed to wriggle out of it...won't stop the left from trying to help her justify her "comments".
Because..we know...that Labor's right to pillory,poke,sneer and scorn whomever and whenever,is just unassailable..right boys?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- sexist language?
sexist language?, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)