Tumbleroll, today you have achieved what Dr.Who assumes to be...

Tumbleroll, today you have achieved what Dr.Who assumes to be your objective, lure Dr.Who into a reaction. The Doc will give it to you for once.

1. Where has Dr Who said SGH is a 100% certainty? I'm certain if Doc looks back there will be plenty of occasions where Dr Who has mentioned risk in this stock (including potential for zero) and that risk remains.

2. You know nothing of Dr.Who's professional status and qualifications and that is the way it should be. To infer Doc is one or the other and determine the Doc is a retail mug is pure guess work on your part and of no consequence to a vibrant discussion board.

3. You have no knowledge of Dr.Who's trading behaviour to determine how agile or not Doc might be. Dr.Who gave an indication of trading behaviour in a post a short while back indicating being long on a stock and a sentiment of buy doesn't necessarily mean hold an optimum quantity of shares at a point in time. Being long and positive sentiment on a stock is not inconsistent with holding no shares or holding just a token number at a point in time. It is conceivable one day Dr.Who may hold just 1000 shares and the next day hold 200,000 shares. None of that matters though because it is nobody's business other than Dr Who.

Tumbleroll you post regularly but offer little. Just sniping and baiting other posters that take time and effort to offer a diverse range of opinions on the stock and market in general. Hopefully some people find Dr.Who informative and educational as Dr.Who finds some other posts informative and educational. That is what a forum is for in Docs opinion, in contrast to baiting people.

In a situation such as SGH-investors find themselves, in Doc's opinion, a forum such as HC is invaluable to counteract the plethora of negativity in the press and as a consequence rehashed on HC. All readers are capable of determining whether or not opinions offer a different slant to mainstream and therefore a rich source of alternative thoughts to consider with own thoughts to decide if S&G is a worthwhile long term investment.

Dr.Who has no problem and welcomes detailed bearish comments, such as those posted by Grant62. Doc disagrees with much of Grant's assertions but they do cause Doc to check and rethink certain parts of Dr.Who's overall case for investment. That is how it should be.

Tumbleroll, you would do well to concentrate on commenting on quality research to back up your turning sour on SGH rather than baiting others. If you did your posts might attract a bit more civil conversation from posters wanting to debate points.