Once again you've chosen to misunderstand. And with a degree of...

Once again you've chosen to misunderstand. And with a degree of hypocrisy even within the same sentence:

"you resort to insults - that indeed is a true reflection of your intellect -"

and

"resorting to childish tactics"

The post WAS the "explanation".

And you also misrepresented:

"Was that you that suggested a trade from 17 - 19"

I did not suggest anyone should make a trade. I ironically suggested that had such a trade taken place it would have reaped a large reward. And I also said in response to Jim that I would be too chicken to do any such thing.

I'm willing to accept that your misunderstanding was unwitting. It was your tone that was insulting in the first place in the first post. If you are honest you will concede this. That was in your terms "childish tactics".

When your own style is lightly mirrored back to you, there is no need to get all sooky.