The map is showing Niobium grades, the claim was about Niobium....

The map is showing Niobium grades, the claim was about Niobium. Discussion about TREO is a different topic, and not what the map and claims are about.

You have just made another claim, all without the slightest shred of evidence. Please provide a link to some information somewhere that backs up your claim of 5-15% TREO in "those" holes to the North of the main mineralisation.

I'm only aware of the cross sections in the PEA showing the location of the TREO, that shows only low grade from 200m North of the main mineralisation, from 0-6%.
That's on fig 18 pg 60 of the PEA if your actually interested. The TREO's also peter out as you go North...